Football Ground Map
Football Ground Map
In the early days of English football, team shirts were kept retro and unadorned by big logos or brand names. Clubs primarily relied on local community support rather than commercial partnerships. Once the potential for lucrative sponsorships was recognized, businesses across various industries jumped at the chance to have their logo displayed on players' chests.
As the game became professional and media coverage broadened, companies realized the immense visibility offered by televised matches. Large firms-often from sectors like breweries and household electronics-used football as a channel to reach numerous viewers across the country, as well as pockets of international audiences. Sponsors wanted to associate their names with the passion that drives fans, hoping this emotional connection would boost brand loyalty.
Gradually, commercial sponsorship turned into one of the most significant revenue streams for clubs. Teams were quick to notice that bigger advertisers were willing to pay increasingly large sums for space on a shirt. Middlesbrough was an early adopter when it displayed a brand on its kit, while other clubs soon followed suit. This transformation opened the door for a wave of sponsorship changes in the years to come, eventually making shirt deals a primary element of football finance.
When the Premier League was formed in 1992, English football took a giant step toward worldwide recognition. Television rights were a major factor-the global reach of broadcast casino partners suddenly exposed top-flight clubs to massive new audiences. Sponsors saw this development as a golden opportunity, especially beyond the UK.
Early on, Premier League clubs were still predominantly sponsored by domestic businesses. More than half of the 1992-93 shirt sponsors were headquartered in the UK. Most of these companies sold products domestically, meaning a direct benefit for the average fan who might head to the store after watching a match. This dynamic reinforced the bond between fans and these more familiar sponsors. However, the rapid rise of international broadcasting deals changed the sponsorship landscape. Businesses from around the world started vying for these coveted spots, recognizing that a front-of-shirt logo would be seen by hundreds of millions of viewers each week. Sponsors no longer needed to rely on local UK sales to justify their investments; global visibility had wider appeal and higher potential returns.
As interest from abroad grew, English-based companies began facing stiff competition from international giants. Air travel brands, financial institutions, and technology companies with headquarters spanning the globe poured resources into securing Premier League shirt deals. The global prestige of clubs like Manchester United, Arsenal, and Liverpool meant that brand exposure would reach nearly every continent.
The shift toward overseas sponsorships was also fueled by budget constraints. Smaller local enterprises found it difficult to match the sums offered by foreign companies with deeper pockets. In many cases, the promise of a worldwide audience was too appetizing for bigger global firms to ignore. Simultaneously, football became more than just a sport; it was a marketing platform that crossed borders. The more the Premier League expanded its international broadcasting and live event presence, the greater the incentive for sponsors from other continents to step in with lucrative deals. This progression set the stage for even more dramatic changes in the types of businesses that would dominate the front of shirts.
In recent years, gambling sponsorship has become increasingly prominent. Their proliferation is starkly evident in the modern Premier League, where nearly half the clubs display betting companies on the front of their shirts. This represents a swift departure from three decades ago, when not a single team wore a gambling sponsor.
Many of these firms reside offshore. Some, based in locations like Curacao, Malta, or the Philippines, have minimal to no actual presence in the UK. While fans might initially assume they can place bets with these companies, that is often not the case. These “white label” operations frequently operate in markets beyond England, using Premier League exposure to target audiences in Asia and elsewhere.
Gambling businesses have gravitated toward sponsoring mid-table or newly promoted clubs, rather than the so-called top six. This approach offers them a cheaper entry point, yet still guarantees worldwide visibility whenever these clubs face global powerhouses. Despite the impending self-imposed ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsors from the 2026-27 season, the current dominance of betting companies shows no signs of immediate decline.
For any sponsor, the front of the shirt is prime property. It appears in every match broadcast, every highlight reel, and nearly every newspaper photo in sports pages. This is why the space commands such high investment. Sponsors recognize that countless eyeballs are fixed on players' shirts whenever a goal is scored, a tackle is made, or a controversial call stirs debate.
Even when fans purchase their favorite club's jersey, they often become walking billboards for that front-of-shirt sponsor. The global fanbase-spanning from the streets of London to markets in Asia-willingly pays to wear merchandise adorned with the sponsor's logo. Thus, clubs can secure great financial deals by selling this real estate, while betting companies and other international firms gain massive brand promotion. Nevertheless, there is mounting criticism from some quarters regarding the ethics of certain sponsors. For gambling companies, critics are concerned about the normalization of betting, particularly among younger viewers. The publicity around these logos, particularly on youth replica kits, has brought the debate about responsible advertising to the forefront.
The Premier League has announced a self-imposed ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsors set to come into effect before the 2026-27 season. While this step seems to recognize the rising discomfort around gambling promotions, opinions are mixed regarding its actual impact. Some believe the ban is largely a symbolic gesture rather than a full-scale effort to disentangle football from gambling promotions.
When clubs can no longer place gambling brands front and center, many expect these companies to relocate their advertising budgets elsewhere. Pitchside hoardings, shirt sleeve deals, and other in-stadium promotional opportunities could easily become more popular. Critics suspect that the ban aligns with a strategy to alleviate public pressure rather than disrupt an otherwise profitable partnership for clubs. Moreover, some younger players already compete in sponsor-free versions of their clubs' shirts. Clubs are required to ensure under-18s are not wearing kits emblazoned with gambling promotion. It underscores how the issue goes beyond finances and touches on player welfare and youth protection. This tension will likely remain, even if the front-of-shirt ban is in place.
There is a clear economic incentive behind these sponsorship shifts. The total value of gambling shirt deals alone in the 2024-25 season stands at approximately $135.43 million (£101.1 million). Clubs seeking a steady income stream, particularly those outside the wealthiest bracket, often find such partnerships too lucrative to turn down.
With revenue from global broadcasts ever on the rise, sponsors are confident that association with Premier League clubs remains a worthwhile investment. Whether it is an airline from the Middle East, a multinational financial services giant, or a gambling company based halfway around the world, the prospect of reaching a massive audience is powerful.
Yet the money flow has guided the direction of shirt sponsorship in ways that no one could have envisaged 30 years ago. The top six clubs-Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester United, Manchester City, and Tottenham Hotspur-often land mega-deals with airlines and banks. Meanwhile, smaller clubs sometimes rely more heavily on gambling sponsorships to remain competitive.
The 91 biggest football stadiums in Europe. From Manchester to Munich, Villa Park to Valencia - each one with a capacity over 40,000
Taking my son to his first football match was one of the best experiences I've had as a father so far. I've written this article for Alex to read when he gets older.
An in-depth look at the biggest football attendances ever recorded, from the 1950 World Cup to pre-season friendlies in the States and the Scottish ground with dozens of 100,000+ attendances
Tony Incenzo has been to over 2,000 football grounds - is he the world's barmiest football fan? Read about his love for Non-League football and groundhopping obsession, including watching a match in prison!
